tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post2184995535790153767..comments2024-01-25T15:09:03.714-08:00Comments on Whiskey's Place: The Elites Are Not The Elite: Harvard, Yale, Caltech, and Harvey MuddWhiskeyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01854764809682029464noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-68632397394471109352012-02-26T13:50:17.716-08:002012-02-26T13:50:17.716-08:00On Sarah Palin - Do you remember her dumb comment...On Sarah Palin - Do you remember her dumb comment "I can see Russia from my house?" Oh yes, so much more profound and intelligent than the black people you're trying to ridicule on the YouTube clips. Also, if Palin is so much more qualified than Obama and other Blacks from the Ivies, how come her vocabulary appears so limited? Gee, she should be 'teachin' them blacks and other mediocre minorities' a more advanced lexicon. Instead, she educates us with exquisite words such as 'Refudiate,' 'misunderestimate,' and 'wee-wee'd up. <br /><br />Let me ask you also, how come Mrs. Palin did not choose to get a degree in Engineering or the Life Sciences? Wait, those darn Blacks and Mexicans must have stolen her spot at MIT! Pleeease, Mrs. Palin went to a community college because of her own limitations. Nothing wrong with that. Hilary Clinton came from a family as white and as middle class as you can get and no Black, Mexican, Asian or extraterrestrial alien prevented her from attending and graduating from Wellesley and Yale Law School, with honors I might add. The same can be said about her dirt poor, country-boy, Arkansan white husband. He too made it to Georgetown and Yale way before he became 'elite.' How did Affirmative Action hurt their chances of being accepted into Ivy schools, I wonder? My ancestry is South American, Filipino and White (so I'm part Latino and Asian) and I went to so-called elite schools myself where I had white classmates from rural towns, one of which even came from an inbred family. I'm not lying. No one stole their spots and I don't recall anyone discriminating them for being poor either. We all got along and helped each other with our papers regardless of race or class. So, no, you have not convinced me that these hordes of undeserving Blacks and Latinos are leaving poor whites without an education. In fact, you've failed miserably to support your point, and only people who make excuses for their own lack of success can find comfort in blaming others. As a young professional female, I've experienced this type of resentment from lackluster people with poor-me mentalities. At my company, some older, white men resent I'm in management when they waste away in lower level positions. Never mind I have a Masters degree in a technical field (which they don't), speak and write better than they do, work overtime and on weekends, which they refuse to, and I take on the more difficult projects that no one wants. Was I "stealing" their spots in school when they never even bother to apply? Enough with the excuses!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-76996269185734973642012-02-26T12:39:17.845-08:002012-02-26T12:39:17.845-08:00The author turned what could have been a thought-p...The author turned what could have been a thought-provoking subject into a rant of personal prejudice (was it necessary for "Whiskey" to label Michelle Obama as an angry black woman to make a point?). First, the United States of America had historically one of the most brutal, repressive, and discriminatory forms of government against Blacks. Have we forgotten the legacy of slavery, "Whites" and "Colored" signs at drinking fountains, black troops fighting separately in ill-equipped battalions, and school segregation? Do you still wonder why after years of institutionalized racism Blacks are still alienated from mainstream America and do not performed en pair with "Whites" who have not experienced this type of racism? Have you also forgotten just how a few decades ago the people you now lumped as "Whites" were considered 'non-white' and looked down upon by other Whites? When poor Irish, Italian, Jews, and many other Eastern and Southern European immigrants arrived en massse they were viewed in pretty much the same way as non-white, poor Mexican immigrants are perceived now. Of these former immigrant groups, only the Jews rose to the top within a generation or two. So, to state that "poor whites",as you put it, are being punished in favor of non-white minorities is simply inaccurate. Historically, few Irish chose higher education and most preferred to join the police force or fire departments. Few Italians did too. A lot, I'm not saying all, of blue-collar Americans are just not into education. Period. American society as a whole has never been known for being intellectual. Just look at the cult of athletes and celebrities. The main problem, as I see it, is the degradation of our public school system. Many white students, and others who are a product of public schools, are simply not motivated to rise to the top of their class and are not even interested in learning their own language well enough to speak or write properly. Personally, I don't think Ebonics and Spanglish should be celebrated, but nor should the use of phrases like "should of", "ain't", "would've went", and other misuse of language I often hear from Whites of all backgrounds. Many Whites I've met made the choice not to pursue college, but work after High School, so they can buy recreational drugs (most Meth addicts are White), and "toys" such as RVs, dirt bikes, etc. So, let's stop blaming Blacks and minorities for the "plight" poor Whites face. In my opinion it's a matter of individual choice and responsibility. While I'm not too keen on the idea of giving anyone a "free ride," I think it would be better if an effort were made to to bring black students up to speed with their counterparts. The whole society, not just the black community, would benefit by having a more qualified workforce. Affirmative Action is certainly flawed and should be replaced by an educational system that ensures disadvantaged students who want to learn have access to the resources (teachers, equipment, environment) that will ensure true competence in the fields of their choosing. However, I would caution anyone not to use Affirmative Action to obviate past injustices and pretend everyone started on equal footing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-35681324031054350472011-12-04T12:44:11.879-08:002011-12-04T12:44:11.879-08:00There's no doubt, the dude is absolutely right...There's no doubt, the dude is absolutely right.www.huesca-3d.comhttp://www.huesca-3d.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-52229858101904437982010-11-03T19:47:13.540-07:002010-11-03T19:47:13.540-07:00"In this country, rich White elites partner w..."In this country, rich White elites partner with non-White aristocrat Affirmative Action (idiots) to provide a perfect Idiocracy."<br /><br /><br />exactly, and when the "women-as-minority" element is added to Nieli's analysis, you end up with the Perfect Shitstorm<br /><br />duh, gee, i just cant understand WHY the "economy" is not going well, or why "boys are underperforming" ... perhaps another couple of decades of Task Force Studies will illuminate us, because the dozens already concluded just cant figger it out....<br /><br />what meritocracy existed in amerika has been dead for at least four decades, and the only solution is to pass more "laws" and<br />build more prisons and ramp up the national scapegoating of non-elite white males <br /><br />"Obama's mother was a CIA connected Phd, and Obama himself enjoyed patronage from a wealthy, Pakistani family at and after his time at Occidental College"<br /><br />ah yes, Asset Anne Dunham<br /><br />both Michelle and Obie were groomed for their current roles, and your focus on Ivy League institutions tells the tale -- these two are Total Tools of the East Coast Cryptocratic establishment that -- appearences notwithstanding -- has NEVER for a second relinquished utter control of the US and, largely, the western world<br /><br />bonesmen once, bonesmen always, the Society first and after that, running a distant last, God<br /><br />these (un)Great Society mass-alterations occurred ONLY after JFK's hit, which catapulted LBJ and his psychotic Lady Bird into the executive, and the CRA '64 immediately followed, originally envisioned as a boost to re-establish fatherhood in black urban areas . . . but was soon redirected to create permanent classes of "oppressed minorities" -- most horrendously including ALL females, no matter how privileged or wealthy, as a collective "protected class"<br /><br />the same old-money east coast elite families still run the show -- idjits like michelle and obie are merely window-dressing to "prove" to dumbed-down amerika how much "progress" is being made<br /><br />chicago is the New Babylon, but most of the real power -- money, personal connections, Medea kontrol, etc. -- is still in the atlantic seaboard spookocracy, allied with interests in brittania<br /><br />despite a life of unearned and unmerited entitlement and privilege, michelle robinson HATED the US right up until the day hubby was appointed president and she installed herself as the self-defined "mom in chief" with granny and Oprah at her side<br /><br />now michelle thinks things are a LITTLE better but oh, there is still SO MUCH MORE to be done before the terrible spectre of sexism and racism are eradicated from the US, free at last, free at last, thank rockefeller we are free at last<br /><br />those who were never oppressed a day in their lives are the true new oppressors<br /><br />despicable<br /><br />hope they finish that new tower soon! :O)<br /><br />raylittle dynamohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11380746207592226835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-76504119655076623772010-10-22T19:40:03.648-07:002010-10-22T19:40:03.648-07:00The Biehls are Jewish.The Biehls are Jewish.Whiskeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01854764809682029464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-77123270305546144942010-10-22T18:38:49.889-07:002010-10-22T18:38:49.889-07:00Whiskey, another advertisement for you:
http://ww...Whiskey, another advertisement for you:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/user/djhero?v=tjbII5xqG8s<br /><br />It really doesn't get more obvious than this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-42662263810010319222010-10-22T02:31:58.226-07:002010-10-22T02:31:58.226-07:00This blog contains a serious factual error. The Ve...This blog contains a serious factual error. The Verbal SAT does not test ability to spout “free-flowing BS.” It tests ability to understand complex ideas and arguments; to analyze, synthesize, and manipulate information; and to distinguishing relevant from irrelevant information. In other words, it tests intelligence. In fact, the Verbal SAT is more “g-loaded” than standard IQ tests; and more g-loaded than the Math SAT. (As I point out in Section B of Appendix III of my book The Affirmative Action Hoax, preparation does little to raise SAT scores, but it raises Math scores more than Verbal scores.) On a simple-minded analysis, the content of most intelligence tests (e.g., Raven’s Progressive Matrices) would seem to be considerably more trivial and irrelevant than the content of the Verbal SAT. But we know as an empirical fact that scores on these tests are highly predictive of individual success; and the average score of a group of people is highly predictive of the success of that group. (Moreover, scores on these tests correlate closely with brain size.)<br />The blogger has made a related mistake. It seems commonsensical that scientists and engineers are the most productive members of a society. However, although they are necessary, they are far from sufficient. The Soviet Union had four times more scientists and engineers than the United States. (The Soviet Union had nearly no lawyers or accountants and no advertising, insurance, or stock and bond markets. Intelligent people became scientists or engineers.) Yet, the Soviet Union was so technologically backward that in 1990, the economic planners, who had to make literally hundreds of thousands of calculations, did not have pocket calculators, they had to use abacuses.<br />Are ordinary people more competent than graduates of elite colleges at making political decisions? Maybe. But of the fifty-five delegates who attended the Constitutional Convention, sixteen were graduates of Harvard, Yale, or Princeton. The three men who spoke the most often at the Convention were a Princeton graduate (James Madison), a Columbia graduate (Gouverneur Morris, who had both a B.A. and an M.A.), and a member of the faculty of the University of Pennsylvania (James Wilson). The Federalist Papers were written by a Princeton graduate and two Columbia graduates. This was at a time when most doctors and lawyers were not even high school graduates.<br />Moreover, the founding fathers of the United States were the same type of people who attend elite colleges today. No one could doubt that if Benjamin Franklin (the president of the American Philosophical Society), John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, etc took the SAT, their Verbal scores would have been extremely high. Some of them might also have had high Math scores, but that is irrelevant.Steven Farronnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-43261217926321600522010-10-21T17:07:14.503-07:002010-10-21T17:07:14.503-07:00ref: "lasting peace between North and South V...ref: "lasting peace between North and South Vietnam"<br /><br />Jesus, that's simply astonishing! When did that fine Yale graduate deliver this breathtaking display of not having a friggin' clue?<br /><br />Should have "declared victory and left, ehhh. What victory? We lost that war big time, and while Ho Chi Ming Ville sure looks a lot like Bangkok, 3.5 decades after the famous rooftop evacuation of our Saigon embassy, there are still zero basic political freedoms --freedom of religion, free speech, free press, right to public redress of grievances. Nah... who needs that crap?Hanoi Paris Hiltonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-14353981571570323062010-10-21T11:45:19.471-07:002010-10-21T11:45:19.471-07:00Rank the Ashkenazi second. Gerald Levin's son ...<i>Rank the Ashkenazi second. Gerald Levin's son was sent to help violent NAMs. This is very common among Ashkenazi, with Ashkenazi taking low paying jobs in the "helping" professions"<br /><br />Again, I put the Northeast Asians at the other end of the spectrum. Has anyone ever heard of a wealthy Northeast Asian following the sort of suicidal altruistic path that WASPS and Ashkenazi follow?</i><br /><br />To be precise, we're dealing with kin altruism and reciprocal altruism here. The "suicidal altruism" referred to above is kin altruism with "kin" being universalized. WASPs certainly have engaged in this universalized kin, or "suicidal" altruism. Ashkenazi altruism in the main certainly hasn't been a suicidal, universalized kin altruism. If anything it has been reciprocal altruism with Ashkenazis deriving benefits as a group through their shepherding of NAMs for the past several decades.<br /><br />The more accurate formulation is the following:<br /><br />1. WASPs have engaged in universalized kin altruism. In other words, they have helped NAMs with no benefit in return to WASPs.<br /><br />2. Ashkenazis have engaged in reciprocal altruism. They have helped NAMs during a period in which Ashkenazis have ascended to dominance in the elite. Helping the NAMs through participation in the Civil Rights movement, Leftism, identity politics, media, culture, etc. very likely was instrumental in propelling Ashkenazis to their dominant position. In other words they have received concrete benefits in return for their altruism.<br /><br />3. Northeast Asians in general have not engaged in much altruism towards NAMs. Communist China has engaged in reciprocal altruism with countries in places like Africa in the past, and more recently with things such as the following:<br /><br />http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-11560193<br /><br />Though South Korea sends the most Christian missionaries abroad in the world after the US, and typical of Christian missionaries they help and aid poor NAMs in their missions in places like Africa, the Mideast, etc. This would be an example of universalized kin altruism. It has been literally suicidal in some cases with South Korean missionaries being killed in the Mideast and Central Asia.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-182197830800696542010-10-21T11:39:08.326-07:002010-10-21T11:39:08.326-07:00"U.S. colleges with few Jews building facilit..."U.S. colleges with few Jews building facilities to draw more"<br /><br />http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/10/11/2741222/small-rural-colleges-cater-to-growing-jewish-populationsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-5945393577778118802010-10-19T16:12:46.682-07:002010-10-19T16:12:46.682-07:00SWPL influences WASPS and Ashkenazi almost equally...SWPL influences WASPS and Ashkenazi almost equally. But In terms of suicidal out group altruism I have to put the WASPS first. <br /><br />There are two competing memes. <br /><br />One is altruism towards the in group. The other meme is altruism towards the out group.<br /><br />In evolution, only in group altruism was rewarded. You would think that in group altruism is hard wired in to us, all of us. <br /><br />I think we should treat out group altruism as a disease, a virus. It reduces genetic fitness. <br /><br />Example would be a white billionaire donating billions to Africa. Some how a status heirarchy has been created in the USA that awards status to those people that help out groups that they are not genetically related to. <br /><br />The competitive out group altruism leads young Ashkenazi to some careers that are not financially rewarding. Huge numbers of Ashkenazi apply for teach for America and similar things. This sometimes goes to extremes, as in the case of Gerald Levin sending his son to tutor violent ghetto youth. Gerald Levin engaged in typical Ashkenazi behavior. Is there any doubt that a non Ashkenazi jew would not sacrifice his son in this way?<br /><br />It is clear to all of us that very few Northeast Asians have out group competitive altruism. If you visited every Northeast Asian billionaire, you would find IQs in the same range as the IQ of the wasp billionaires and Ashkenazi billionaires, but very different behaviour.<br /><br />My observation is that on a scale from most out group altruistic to least you would have <br />WASP billionaires as most out group altruistic, <br />then ashkenazi billionaires<br />then at the very bottom Northeast Asian billionaires. <br /><br />Again, I think that Amy Biehl's parents (WASPS) were the most extreme. Not only did they send their daughter to be killed by NAMS but they then socialized with the NAM killers of their daughter and lobbied hard for their daughter's killers to not be punished.<br /><br />There are other examples of WASP out group altruism but I'd like to hear if there are any that extreme. <br /><br />Rank the Ashkenazi second. Gerald Levin's son was sent to help violent NAMs. This is very common among Ashkenazi, with Ashkenazi taking low paying jobs in the "helping" professions"<br /><br />Again, I put the Northeast Asians at the other end of the spectrum. Has anyone ever heard of a wealthy Northeast Asian following the sort of suicidal altruistic path that WASPS and Ashkenazi follow?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-30599930500330868722010-10-19T07:00:14.559-07:002010-10-19T07:00:14.559-07:00Obviously your absurd attempt to replace 3000+ yea...<i>Obviously your absurd attempt to replace 3000+ years of Jewish identity with 40 some years of SWPL motivation is a sign of deep evasion and denial. </i><br /><br />Willard, I don't think you understand SWPL in the least if you really think it's effected by your "3000+ years of Jewish identity."<br /><br />Is SWPL stronger than ethnic identity? It is incomparably stronger among the well to do. It's not even a contest. <br /><br />I know you frown on examples from Hollywood, but they are telling. Watch Larry David in "Curb Your Enthusiasm" as he flits around town in his Prius, and tell me what are the key influences in his life. He is typical. That's why the show is funny. Because so many of us know people exactly like him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-41172775677163111522010-10-18T15:54:21.481-07:002010-10-18T15:54:21.481-07:00Whiskey your anxiety about any criticism of Jews i...Whiskey your anxiety about any criticism of Jews is interesting in the light of claims by some that you are actually Jewish. Based on your ignorance of Jewish identity and behavior my guess is you are not Jewish.<br /><br />Combined with your White nerdy fear of women your ridiculous views on Jewish identity probably stem from a frustrated Christian upbringing.<br /><br />Clearly what you said about Jews was nonsense. And your anti-semitism baiting is the kind of debate stifling ploy typical of liberals who accuse people of racism for criticising blacks.<br /><br />Most Jews see themselves as Jews, a people with an ancient identity that was formed in relation to a dangerous and threatening "Other". In America that "Other" is Whitey also known as Wasps or White Christians.<br /><br />Obviously your absurd attempt to replace 3000+ years of Jewish identity with 40 some years of SWPL motivation is a sign of deep evasion and denial.<br /><br /><i>Jews who saw themselves only as Jews would not have supported Obama about 70% (since Obama is very hostile to Israel and is essentially a Muslim).</i><br /><br />Jews supported Obama because he is a classic White liberal, Ivy league Democrat. They were well aware that all of his early funding in Chicago came from prominent Jews and clearly Axelrod is Jewish.<br /><br />Plus, the opposing presence of Uber-shiksa Sarah Palin sent a cold shiver down the spine of most Jews. Gun toting rural Christians will send most Jews into a panic.<br /><br />Obama is clearly not hostile to Israel and like most America Jews he opposes the Jewish extremism favored by the White America Evangelical right wing.<br /><br />And contrary to your paranoid claim that Obama is essentially muslim, he is pretty clearly a secular, non religious liberal who adopts a church going style for purely political reasons.<br /><br />He obviously is in no way a muslim.<br /><br />SWPLism is in many ways completely contrary to Jewish culture and behavior in America. At it's core SWPLism is a form of White racial self hate and racial masochism dressed up in fashionable clothing. <br /><br />Most Jews who adopt any of these tendencies do so to contribute to the racial subversion of their ethnic enemy - White (Christian) America.<br /><br />It can be understood best by referring to something Steve Sailer said -(paraphrase) "Wasps are hostile to other Wasps for being too ethnocentric, Jews are hostile to other Jews for not being ethnocentric enough".Willard Libbynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-30913464832849388122010-10-17T21:50:09.408-07:002010-10-17T21:50:09.408-07:00Passing Through -- You'll have to add Steve Sa...Passing Through -- You'll have to add Steve Sailer into that bin too. As he points out, no White guy has been in the finals of the Olympic 100 Meter Dash since 1980. No person of non-West African descent in fact has been a finalist since that boycotted Olympics.<br /><br />Does that make Usain Bolt a Nietchezian Superman? Nope. It just makes him very, very fast. Small but significant differences in group populations median ability in athletics, or IQ, or tendency to alcoholism, make for large differences in the right hand of the bell curve. This means no Whites present at Olympic Sprint events (dominated by West African descent men) and also no West African (or African men) in the Nobel Prizes for Chemistry, Physics, Medicine etc. who are exclusively European and East Asian. Jews disproportionately represented there as well. Or few alcoholic Italians but many Irishmen and Scandinavians.<br /><br />Differences among groups and races does not make for superiority. Which is the 'master fruit' the Orange or the Apple?<br /><br />HBD is good, as it allows a diverse human genome to spread around keep genetic insurance against some huge change: mutated viruses, changes in food supply, or many other things no one can anticipate.<br /><br />Jews voted SWPL more than Jewishness, since Obama (born, raised a Muslim, able to recite the call to prayer, believed by Muslims to be a Muslim) is determined to allow Iran to get nukes and wipe out Israel. Obama would if he could cease all aid to Israel and senior Aides (Susan Power, etc.) have spoken about invading Israel to install Hamas as sole ruler of the land. The guy went to Wright's church of Hate Whitey and Jews for twenty years.<br /><br />And Jews still voted for Obama in the same numbers as single women, about 70-29%. Why? Because SWPL over-rides Jewishness.Whiskeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01854764809682029464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-22102001472398783112010-10-17T09:40:05.755-07:002010-10-17T09:40:05.755-07:00I never get tired of watching that Hank Johnson cl...I never get tired of watching that Hank Johnson clip. What a moron.Slartibartfastnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-3926148754402448152010-10-17T01:04:42.618-07:002010-10-17T01:04:42.618-07:00Whiskey said...
Willard, as usual your hatred for...Whiskey said...<br /><br /><i>Willard, as usual your hatred for Jews leads to a weak mind unable to grasp the obvious. Jews are among the most "White" groups of Caucasians, leading them to SWPL status seeking (including glorifying Blacks and using them as status props.</i><br /><br />Funny you should say that, Whiskey, as I've never seen anyone glorify blacks more than you do. You never pass up a chance to eulogize their supposed sexual prowess and athletic superiority.<br /><br /><i>Jews would not have supported Obama about 70% (since Obama is very hostile to Israel and is essentially a Muslim).</i><br /><br />It's closer to 80%, actually. And last I checked, military aid was still flowing into the Holy Land. Financial aid to Israel has not been touched. Obama is a moron, but I doubt he's an anti-semite as you seem to be suggesting, what with hiring a Jewish guy to run his campaign, hiring the son of a militant Zionist as his chief of staff, sending yet another Jew to the supreme court etc.Passing throughnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-29359847050715905572010-10-16T22:39:47.398-07:002010-10-16T22:39:47.398-07:00Whiskey--
Many thanks for pointing out the the Or...Whiskey--<br /><br />Many thanks for pointing out the the Orthodox (who will ultimately be the only Jews left due to our more secular types decision to forgo breeding) conservatism.<br /><br />I particularly enjoy your blog because you have stedfastly refused to get caught up in the creeping anti-semitism I see among some of the more popular similarly focused blogs. I won't mention any names, but I think you know who they are.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-47696438330331244392010-10-16T18:13:58.860-07:002010-10-16T18:13:58.860-07:00The "elites" are her to say.
Blacks lik...The "elites" are her to say.<br /><br />Blacks like them, women like them, People of Coor like them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-53623199779344500602010-10-16T15:41:19.174-07:002010-10-16T15:41:19.174-07:00Willard, as usual your hatred for Jews leads to a ...Willard, as usual your hatred for Jews leads to a weak mind unable to grasp the obvious. Jews are among the most "White" groups of Caucasians, leading them to SWPL status seeking (including glorifying Blacks and using them as status props, particularly with Jews active in Civil Rights movements and supporting Blacks now, the latter generally filled with McDonald level anti-semitism), or Republican conservatism, including dislike of Gays and support for Israel (see Paladino with the Orthodox rabbis).<br /><br />Jews mostly don't see themselves as Jews. Which is why they out-marry so much that there won't be any in a few generations. Jews who saw themselves as only Jews would not have created: Old Patriotic Hollywood, from Yankee Doodle Dandy to A Wonderful Life, Captain America, Superman, Batman, Spider-Man, the Hulk, Iron Man, etc. Jews who saw themselves only as Jews would not have supported Obama about 70% (since Obama is very hostile to Israel and is essentially a Muslim).<br /><br />Jews are among the forefront of SWPL, and cultural conservatism. Jews among all groups have proven unusually susceptible to status-chasing and empty moral posturing (see Amy Biehl and her parents, who paid for her Black SA murders to go to school). Because SWPL status chasing forms the core of their identity. <br /><br />Which is another weakness of the elite. Moral status chasing is a particular disease among them. This is because their economic position is not much at risk, or they don't see it as such save challenges from ordinary people.Whiskeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01854764809682029464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-74911091230738617922010-10-16T08:56:50.914-07:002010-10-16T08:56:50.914-07:00Agreed. Good response to Novaseeker. Good comment ...Agreed. Good response to Novaseeker. Good comment on his part as well. I'd add that the technocratic elite are going with a dependency model where their existence and necessity aren't fundamentally questioned.<br /><br />Even many right minded people, not directly on any sort of dole, don't go far enough questioning the status quo. Why not abolish the Dept of Education? The few who suggest it are mocked. Yet a results based analysis would show outcomes have gotten worse since its creation. "What about the children" they say even as the children lose ground. <br /><br />Too much is asumed sacred. Too many, especially women, want mommy and daddy or some authority in charge. They fawn over these people.<br /><br />No one presents bureaucracy as a problem and so we're ruled by bureaucratic strivers. Actual self-made men are busy creating to the extent the bureaucratic strivers don't obstruct.<br /><br />And excuse grammatical errors in previous post.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-3590931211606623592010-10-16T08:07:29.533-07:002010-10-16T08:07:29.533-07:00Clinton’s true legacy is GATT/WTO. By signing the ...Clinton’s true legacy is GATT/WTO. By signing the agreement he put the US in pole position for the global race to the bottom and made pissants are equals. Successive bubbles and easy credit masked the damage. That’s what most adversely affected the working and middle class whites, among others, that you write about. The legacy matters. Give credit where it’s due.<br /><br />In the CT gubernatorial race the Democrat is accusing the Republican (a wealthy business man) of closing a textile mill in Georgia, laying off all the workers. The media actually got it right in pointing out the mill closed after the candidate’s involvement, but they didn’t make the connection with WTO policies opening up textile competition from developing countries.<br /><br />For what it’s worth, I’m sure the worst of Obama’s presidency won’t be felt until he’s out of office. And the same basic trajectory probably would have occurred under McCain or Hillary, just as Obama only differs from Bush in degree. It’s an agenda at work from one administration to the next. That’s how we can know we live under tyranny.<br /><br />Another thing, it’s pretty easy to find a congressman speaking utter stupidity. Have you heard Pelosi lately? With few exceptions they have mediocre intellects.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-62844573186038123662010-10-15T21:52:01.911-07:002010-10-15T21:52:01.911-07:00Sorry, I meant Anne Applebaum.Sorry, I meant Anne Applebaum.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-80389890801201912742010-10-15T21:49:44.229-07:002010-10-15T21:49:44.229-07:00Whiskey,
I don't think Hank Johnson meant it ...Whiskey,<br /><br />I don't think Hank Johnson meant it literally about Guam tipping over and capsizing. He and that admiral fellow looked like they were suppressing a smirk.<br /><br />The other lady, Sheila Jackson Lee, well, who knows? She seems more than a little ignorant and she never struck me as a brainiac. Officious and supercilious, though.<br /><br />As for Anne Rosenbaum, isn't she married to Radek Sikorski, former foreign minister for Poland? I would thought since her husband has ties to AEI that they are both neoconservative or what passes for mainstream conservatism circa 1999. Strange bedfellows, indeed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-43118654633046696912010-10-15T19:13:14.863-07:002010-10-15T19:13:14.863-07:00Whiskey said...
Willard: the most Jewish of Jews,...<i>Whiskey said...<br /><br />Willard: the most Jewish of Jews, the Orthodox, are all Republicans.</i><br /><br />Right, because they hate queers and love Israel. Just like so many "Christian" Republicans.<br /><br /><i>Even middle class Jewish guys (I knew a bunch, liked them all) are Howard Stern, Adam Sandler types.</i><br /><br />Stern and Sandler are super rich not middle class and Stern supported Obama. But why mention those two when they are out number 100 to 1 at least by liberal left Jews in the entertainment industry.<br /><br /><i>Not conservative but not liberal either. No one does Upper Class SWPL folk better than Upper Class Jews, because no one is Whiter than White than Jews.</i><br /><br />That's a stupid thing to say. Plenty of Jews see themselves as JEWS and see "White people" as the "Other", a dangerous majority who they fear and ethnically compete against.<br /><br /><i>From Howard Stern and Sandler, to Ben Stein, to Chelsea Handler.</i><br /><br />Again, as with your psychotic prejudice against women, you find a few examples to reinforce your bias and ignore the majority of evidence that clearly contradicts your views.<br /><br /><i>The Jewish Left finds repulsive (much like a hot woman worshiped by a nerd) that American Evangelical Conservatives identify with Jews because they feel themselves "New Jews."</i><br /><br />The Jewish left and right are basically racist in a judeocentric sense and don't like any people racially "Other" claiming their superior identity.<br /><br />That's an ethnocentric/racist bias that plenty of Jews have regardless of party politics.<br /><br /><i>Anonymous said...<br /><br />Why the Jewish Left can't grasp that White Christians are their natural allies is beyond me.</i><br /><br />It's "beyond you" because you aren't seeking an answer.<br /><br />You are confused. The Jewish left liberals are looking for allies AGAINST White Christians. That's the whole point. And guess who they think their allies are?<br /><br />You can learn more by extensively reading <a href="http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?tag=kevin-macdonald" rel="nofollow"> Kevin MacDonald's work</a>Willard Libbynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3893665144141962944.post-56649029506939184802010-10-15T19:08:49.687-07:002010-10-15T19:08:49.687-07:00spot on, Whiskey.
Both the post, and your replies ...spot on, Whiskey.<br />Both the post, and your replies to Nova. <br /><br />Fact is, people want leaders who are competent and can lead. Self-made men are admired provided they are successful and competent - Napoleon had lots of admirers in America in the 19th century not because he founded a new aristocracy but because he got to his position on merit and genius where the Kings and Dukes and all failed.<br /><br />I don't mind taking orders from a man -or even woman in some cases - more competent than me, esp. if they are civil and fair in their expectations. I suspect most people are the same way. We don't need a Royal Family here -one of the reasons that the Kennedys had so many admirers was that besides the romance, at least one of them- Robert- was considered a great President based on charisma and what he did get accomplished while he was alive. Had the Kennedys merely consisted a few corrupt state Senators it would be different.<br /><br />ClarenceAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com