It's Basically Over For Anglos

The Houston Chronicle quotes a demographer, Steve Murdock, who notes looking at population projections for Texas, "It's basically over for Anglos." The story reports that two out of every three Texas children are non-Anglo (almost all Mexican origin) and that will become even more pronounced in the future. Murdock is a former U.S. Census Bureau Director and is currently the Director of the Hobby Center for the Study of Texas at Rice University. Murdock says that Texas is divided into two: an aging Anglo population and a young, almost entirely Mexican origin population. This sets up the mother of all spoils battles: spend on mostly Mexican kids, or aging Whites. The impact of this spoils battle could conceivably, if it spirals out of control, lead to a break-up of the US along racial lines, at worst. Its been predicted, before, by men who are no fringe figures.

Between 2000 and 2040, the state's public school enrollment will see a 15 percent decline in Anglo children while Hispanic children will make up a 213 percent increase, he said.

The state's largest county - Harris - will shed Anglos throughout the coming decades. By 2040, Harris County will have about 516, 000 fewer Anglos than lived in the Houston area in 2000, while the number of Hispanics will increase by 2.5 million during the same period, Murdock said. The projection assumes a net migration rate equal to one-half of 1990-2000.
…
B y 2040, only 20 percent of the state's public school enrollment will be Anglo, he said. Last year, non-Hispanic white children made up 33.3 percent of the state's 4.8 million public school enrollment.

Of the state's 254 counties, 79 recorded declining population during the past 20 years. All are rural. An additional 30 Texas counties, he said, would have also lost population had they not experienced Hispanic growth.

The state's future looks bleak assuming the current trend line does not change because education and income levels for Hispanics lag considerably behind Anglos, he said.

Unless the trend line changes, 30 percent of the state's labor force will not have even a high school diploma by 2040, he said. And the average household income will be about $6,500 lower than it was in 2000. That figure is not inflation adjusted so it will be worse than what it sounds.

"It's a terrible situation that you are in. I am worried," Murdock said.

Whites are defacto minorities in California, Arizona, Texas, and Nevada. In California, Hispanics outnumber Whites absolutely, while in Arizona, Texas, and Nevada about two thirds of children under 14 are Hispanic, and only about a third White. If one believes in unicorns, rainbows, and fairies (the Tinkerbell kind, not the San Francisco leather-bound kind) then this will be no problem. "Magic" will sprinkle pixie dust on Hispanic children, magically making them achieve the same educational levels, same low levels of criminal activity, same economic levels, as the White populations they are replacing. And everyone will dance around singing Kumbayah and holding hands in one giant post-racial party, happy to have conquered "Whiteness." This is the fantasy of the Puritan-Progressive elite, and post-Quakers, the cultural heirs to the New England Puritans and Pennsylvania Quakers. Who believe in a mish-mash of "elect and damned" and "be nice to others, they'll be nice to you." The latter sound advice when your neighbors are the Amish, not so sound when they are MS-13 or the Zetas.

The reality is likely to be quite different. First, flight. As noted extensively in "Albion's Seed" by David Hackett Fischer, the response of the British Borderers and their "hillbilly" descendants has been first to flee. Then fight when left with no alternative. Fleeing is easier than fighting, and all cultural groups of White people, the New England Puritans, the Virginian Cavaliers, the Mid Atlantic Quakers, and the Appalachian Backwoodsmen, do their utmost to remove themselves culturally, physically, and socially from non-Whites. No group of White people clamors to live in the Ghetto or Barrio, instead they at best in times of high real estate prices urge gentrification, to move those people out of desirable real estate. At other times Whites cluster in exclusively White areas. Appalachian folk tend towards country music, NASCAR, and rural/suburban areas noted for their lack of non-Whites. Mid-Atlantic Quakers and Post Puritan-Progressives enjoy classical music, jazz and the blues (which Blacks have fled from in panic due to White popularity), 80's music, gentrified urban settings and "hip-trendy" outposts like Asheville NC or Austin TX that are nearly exclusively White. [The Cavaliers of Virginia of course are long dead and gone, culturally.] Even the most enthusiastic proponent in Hollywood of "magical Blackness" (that Spike Lee among others complain about) do their utmost to live in lily-White areas: Malibu, Santa Monica, Brentwood, etc. Indeed, at no time has all of White America been so exclusively White, and culturally as well as physically removed from Blacks and Hispanics. You won't find any Whites not even those most enthusiastic about illegal immigration and "the end of Whiteness" watching Sabado Gigante on Univision.

So fleeing will continue, until there is nowhere to flee to, by average Whites. Upper class, more wealthy Whites have already fled to exclusive White urban zones, such as Malibu or NYC's Upper East Side. But flight is not sustainable forever, and the other notable characteristic of the Backwoods folk is their propensity to fight, often to the bitter end, when cornered and their conception of "natural liberty" is infringed upon. Indeed, as the cultural grouping of Backwoods grows, at the expense of the Mid-Atlantic and Puritan-Progressive groupings, the tendency to fight to "protect your liberty" is only going to get stronger, and tinged with pure racial identification.

Being a Puritan-Progressive, or Mid-Atlantic utopianist, takes money and security. Without money to isolate one's self from non-Whites (and those outside your cultural grouping as well) it cannot be sustained. Without physical safety, a strong and efficient police force that crushes any attempt to victimize the White Puritan-Progressive or the Mid-Atlantic Utopian elites, that cultural grouping cannot be sustained. You cannot believe in original racial sin (Whites) and redemption (making Whites minorities in their own countries to get rid of those Backwoodsmen to whom all sin accrues) during a Home Invasion. Or your kid getting beat up at school due to "Whiteness" or any myriad other violent or hostile encounters with non-Whites asserting physical dominance, control, and so on. It is easy to decry the "stupid racism of Hillbillies" in Malibu gated communities and mansions. Much harder to do it when your neighborhood is over-run with MS-13 or the Zetas, and your kids get beat up every day. Or your household income takes massive hits just for private school to keep your kids from a daily beating. Or rising fuel costs force you into daily and bitterly resented contact with hostile non-Whites.

The ascendancy of the Puritan-Progressive and Mid-Atlantic utopian ideals, of pre-destined damned and saved, and magical goodness of non-Whites, depended on constantly rising incomes to produce enough economic margin to grow and convert Whites to that cultural grouping. A sustained downward spiral pushes Whites to nationalism, high rates of physical mobility, intense personal loyalty to a few leaders, and a desire to fight along clan/family/tribal basis for "natural liberty" i.e. the ideal of being left alone, government being merely a means for others, (in this case non-Whites) to oppress ordinary people. Call this the Hillbilly way. The Hillbilly Way tends to grow (a lot) when times turn hard, for a good long spell. [It was the political genius of FDR to pull Hillbillies his way, by deporting every Mexican he could, and preventing Blacks from unionizing or even voting in the same Democratic Primary as Whites, until 1944.]

Cue the spoils fights. There will be a "stuck group" that will not be able to flee to Whitopia, and indeed the Puritan-Progressive and Mid Atlantic Utopianists (motivated by sheer hatred of "the Hillbilly Way" and Hillbillies) have done their best to encourage a "drowning of Whiteness" (and hated cultural rivals) by importing masses of non-Whites, both Mexican illegal aliens, and various non-White refugees, and settling them in places like Idaho, or Wisconsin, or Minnesota, or Maine. Whitopia is no longer so White. Setting up the fight part of flight or fight.

Will an aging White population tax itself basically out of existence, to educate and provide welfare for non-Whites who are as a matter of course, both innately hostile to them and replacing them totally? The answer is no. Nor will a non-White population tax itself, or even devote a smidgen of public funds, to support aging Whites who they both despise and know they will replace. This extends of course to the current budget struggle in California, where Jerry Brown is hinting he'll dump State workers benefits and salaries, already agreed upon, to spend the money on Hispanics: health care, education, and welfare. Even with massive tax increases, the only way to keep spending mountains of money on the California Hispanic population is by gutting the money spent on mostly White state and local government workers.

At its possible worst, this sets the stage for what Igor Panarin predicted: civil war and secession over spoils and public spending. Widely dismissed as naïve and stupid at the time, Panarin (not a fringe figure, rather a respected dean of Russia's academy for diplomats) seems prophetic. While the exact breakdown of a US split and dissolution might be argued, it cannot be dismissed out of hand. Simply because there is no example, in all of human history, of a democratic republic being multi-racial and multicultural. At best, brutal dictators who rule with the help of a favored group, by mercilessly hounding the other out-groups, provide the stability of the grave. Tito, Stalin, Mithridates, Caesar Augustus, Ghengis Khan, all come to mind. Human beings simply are not built to trust and trade resources fairly and freely across racial lines in a republic (rights of minorities and dissenters respected) and democracy (majority rule). It has never ever happened in all of human history and culture, which is considerable. Because, quite likely, the kin-based nature of human evolution has pre-disposed us to cooperate on racial/cultural lines: people who reasonably look, act, sound, and otherwise resemble distant cousins. We certainly do have many examples, as Amy Chua's "World on Fire" show, of democratic majorities constantly victimizing minorities. The difference of course is that in the US, the minorities (Whites) are likely to fight back.

Here is what the man had to say (the map at the top of the post is from the WSJ story):

He based the forecast on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI analysts, he says. He predicts that economic, financial and demographic trends will provoke a political and social crisis in the U.S. When the going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.

Yes, he sounds at least half-way accurate. Financial, demographic, and economic crisis have all hit the US at the same time. Indeed the crisis are largely driven by demographic trends. Replacing Whites with non-Whites would be problematic (based on human nature) if the replacers were wealthier than Whites. Given that they are in fact much poorer and remain so, this makes conflict of some sort (hopefully only political) inevitable.

Of course, violent secession is not set in stone. But neither is it an unlikely fantasy. Fleeing Whites who were in effect ethnically cleansed out of California, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, and Florida are unlikely to be willing to transfer funds from wealthier White states such as Idaho, or South Dakota, to Texas and the rest of the "Mexico Norte" states. Money to be spent on the very people who ethnically cleansed them out of their homes in the first place. Nor is there any way to construct a "grand bargain" -- Hispanics (mostly all Mexicans) spending money to care for an aging White population in exchange for taxes spent to educate poor Mexicans and provide welfare. First, there will not be enough money to go around, the average income gap per household is about $16,000 of White vs. Hispanic in 2009 dollars according to the US Census Bureau. There has been no narrowing the gap over the last twenty years, instead it has only increased. And socially, Hispanics have had growing maladaptive behaviors to increase income: growing not decreasing levels of illegitimacy, growing not decreasing levels of drop out rates, growing not decreasing levels of Spanish only language skills. Meanwhile the burden of providing health, education, and welfare of a desperately poor population of illegal aliens and one only slightly less desperately poor (the children of illegal aliens and every descendant afterwards) increases exponentially.

There would be barely enough money to provide for White social security and other retirement issues (health care). There is without question not enough money to provide for the "Mexicanization" of much of the United States. The health care, education, and welfare needs are so great that even if no money was spent at all on elderly Whites, there would not be enough to go around. Poor people, it seems, cost a lot.

Which means conflict. This conflict can be done by more peaceful means, through political action that makes decisions stick, by forcing those without means and power to fight back to accept a fait-accompli (basically a re-run of the Trail of Tears, some form of mass deportations of the out-group), or a process that spirals out of control into violence. Given the entrenched interests that benefit from Mexicanization of America, and the sheer hatred of "Hillbillies" by Progressive-Puritans and Mid Atlantic Idealists, a good bet is on the latter. Of course, any such process is likely 15 to 25 years out, but it is highly likely at some point. A good many political analysts predicted the Civil War by 1835, and as note by Panarin, the collapse of the USSR by the 1970's. America could no more remain half-slave and half-free as it can half-Mexican-dominated and half-not-Mexican-dominated. The cultural, economic, political, and mass population conflicts in each case make some sort of total loser/total winner outcome, by whatever means, almost inevitable.

In this case, it is worth noting that the US military already remains in the views of some, dangerously isolated and quite angry at much of Establishment America. This story from Politico touches on the divide between "peacetime America" and the Wartime Military. Columbia Students shouted "racist" at a wounded, wheel-chair bound vet who spoke out for ROTC on campus, while others jeered and laughed at his injuries. Meanwhile US Defense Secretary Robert Gates worries:

A decade of constant conflict has trained a junior officer corps with exceptional leadership skills, he told the cadets, but the Army may find it difficult in the future to find inspiring work to retain its rising commanders as it fights for the money to keep large, heavy combat units in the field.

“Men and women in the prime of their professional lives, who may have been responsible for the lives of scores or hundreds of troops, or millions of dollars in assistance, or engaging or reconciling warring tribes, may find themselves in a cube all day re-formatting PowerPoint slides, preparing quarterly training briefs, or assigned an ever-expanding array of clerical duties,” Mr. Gates said. “The consequences of this terrify me.”

Hmmm … let me see now. An officer corps, almost exclusively White, Southern/Western, conservative, mirrored fairly completely down to the lowest detail of enlisted men? A feckless, and clueless national leadership intent on massively changing the way of life of pretty much everyone in the country that is also innately hostile to the Military itself? Mixed with an economic crisis, fiscal crisis, and political crisis all tracing their origins to what amounts to complete demographic replacement of Whites by Mexicans in the US, all without any vote or constitutional amendment? Where have I seen anything like this before? Add to this the de-industrialization of the North and North East, and growing move of what little manufacturing there is to Southern and Western states, and things look different than in 1860.

Naturally, and often fortunately, the future does not move in straight lines. Something is endurable, until it becomes un-endurable. Various agitators are effective, or not. Crisis that should have been foreseen, sneak up on everyone while distraction over piddling events reigns. Human error or courage, stupidity or wisdom, change events from a certainty to a new course. Sometimes even natural disasters can take a hand in shaping history. The Kamikaze originally referred to the near-miraculous typhoon that sunk the Mongol Invasion fleet that would have easily conquered Japan. The Monguls were near invincible. Save for water.

So it is possible, and hopeful, that Mexican immigration into this country slows dramatically, and is even reversed. That sudden cutbacks in welfare spending provoke a soul-searching and wrenching amount of changes in Hispanic behavior, with norms of marriage before children, educational striving, and low crime being a sudden radical shift. Anything can happen. Perhaps an early encounter, with the "aging Anglo population" getting its way with fiscal policy, can create a rapid desire for assimilation by the coming Mexican majority.

The smart bet based on Human History, however, says greed and stupidity will preclude any rational attempt to settle a division of resources and control, short of violence and brutal coercion, and America will indeed slide into the conflict envisioned by Igor Panarin. Not of course, right away. But inevitably, as the call of the trumpets at Shiloh and Bull Run and Gettysburg were heard even in 1835, so the siren call of war and conflict is being heard already. Driven by fundamental conflicts.

It is all over for Anglos in Texas. Also California, Arizona, Florida, and probably Illinois. Whites are now the functional minority, in the US. While being the target of non-Whites for resource extraction, the White to non-White gap in income being considerable and growing. Amy Chua's model of "market dominant minorities" will probably hold for Bill Gates kids, and Warren Buffett's, and perhaps even Mitt Romney's kids. But for the great rest of the average White guy, flight will soon turn into fight. Because life as basically a third class citizen in Mexico Norte is worth fighting to avoid, everything else notwithstanding. With conveniently, a great deal of military men who got battlefield training (Lee and the other Southern Commanders all had extensive experience in the Mexican-American War, the Union Officer Corps till Grant and Sherman were time-serving non-entities who had no real combat/leadership experience) and find little else to interest them. While a great deal of the current New England/Mid Atlantic elite holds them in mutual contempt and disgust.

Ultimately, a non-White America will resemble Mexico, only slightly better off. The same levels of corruption, violence, and government services will prevail. With an added feature of ethnically/racially driven violence and government discrimination. Good government, security, prosperity, all cost money. They can only be achieved, history shows us, with an ethnically and culturally unitary, large and dominant middling class that controls the government and directs its spending and aims for its own ends. There is a reason the Philippines and places like it are chaotic, violent, and poor. Despite the ability to punish and extract at times resources from Chua's "Market Dominant Minorities."

In any conflict, moreover, the initiative remains with a more unified, disciplined, experienced, and smarter opponent. Sheer numbers can at times overwhelm, but at other times provide only carnage and cannon fodder. Speed, mobility, surprise, and most critical of all, discipline under chaos tend to produce the most winners, in politics and in war. Conflict of some sort is coming, that much is certain. You cannot have population replacement, a welfare state, and legalized racial caste systems (Whites on bottom) and not have conflict in some form. Let us hope and pray the basic resource division: spend on older Whites or younger Hispanics, is settled short of violence with conclusive finality, through political means, avoids a break-up of the US, and restores a racial unity and peacefulness to America.



...Read more

The Ground Zero Victory Mosque: the Mau-Mau Consequences

Now that Obama has strongly backed the Ground Zero Victory Mosque, celebrating 9/11 and the Muslim victory over America, it is fair to ask, what will be the consequences? The consequences are easy to foresee, though few wish to speak of them. The Mosque will be built. It will be the focal point for Jihadist, Islamist preachers to celebrate victory and dominance, and 9/11 explicitly. Infiltrators will find a way to smuggle cameras in and post video of Muslims dancing and celebrating 9/11 and the hijackers, praising bin Laden and AQ. Muslims will use the Ground Zero Victory Mosque as a base to march and intimidate 9/11 mourners with the passive police approval of the Bloomberg Administration (and that of Obama's Administration). Any protest against the Mosque will be met with protective investigations and arrests by the City of New York and the Feds. Meanwhile the provocative weakness of allowing the Ground Zero Victory Mosque will be so tempting that large amounts of domestic jihad against non-Muslims among Muslims residing in America, and mass casualty plots from abroad against Americans, many of them successful, will produce a massive death toll. In New York and elsewhere in America.

Until anger among the non-Muslim population is so high, that an American Mau-Mau movement will spring up. It did not have to be this way. But it is now inevitable. As sadly destined as the trenches of the Somme were in 1912. The smell was not yet manifest, but those who could see, saw it coming. Even if years later the Kaiser lamented, "this is not what I wanted!"


There is, globally in the West, and America is no exception, a bizarre, three-sided struggle. On the one hand is the elite, the rulers of the West, who hate and despise their own people. In part because their advantages are hereditary, and they aim to keep them that way by keeping their own native peoples down and repressed, or replaced by alien peoples. Hence support for mass immigration into the US by Mexicans, for votes and population replacement, and mass immigration into Europe, for votes and population replacement, as the link from Andrew Breitbart's Big Peace story on the Africanization of France demonstrates.

A rising, competitive, native White population in Europe, or America, produces strong competitive threats to current elites in the West. The Simpsons could be just as funny if their writers came from say, University of Idaho, or Cal State Long Beach, as Harvard. They'd certainly be cheaper. Hiring on merit of course would reduce the patronage power of head writers and producers from Harvard, and move that power to folks who would resemble Spielberg who started at Cal State Long Beach. Hence the need to suppress them (and also the fear associated with them) by mass immigration that can "drown" the competitive threats demographically.

Culturally, the elites wish to distinguish themselves as much as possible from ordinary people. Hence granite counter top kitchens, or a hip and trendy coffee place not named Starbucks, or hipster affectations. There is of course, a gender component:



The infamous Staples "Dell Ink" commercial (idiot White guy replaced by hunky, smart-together Black guy) comes to mind, but any number of commercials follow this rule, or movies for that matter. In "Salt," the Angelina Jolie thriller, the bad guy is the smooth and handsome White guy, and the good guy is the Black CIA agent. The CIA is apparently filled with Black and Hispanic agents and computer experts (in reality the CIA is among the Whitest of the National Security agencies, and filled with desk-bound analysts whose idea of excitement is a new restaurant in Georgetown). Computer experts are found in the NSA, or the DIA.

While part of this dynamic is accounted for by the dominance of gays and women of color in Advertising Agencies that dream up these spots, and terminal PC in Hollywood, success in the business/corporate world depends mostly on go-along, hard work, punishing hours, and not making waves. In a word, "boring" compared to the dreams of masculine dominance pushed by Hollywood and desired by most women. If the idea that the ordinary White guy was so boring (and lame) that it was repellent to most women consumers (the targets of most advertising), no matter how much that message resonated among Ad Agencies (or Hollywood screenwriters and executive suites), most of it would be dialed down. As Judd Apatow explained to LAT movie critic Carina Chocano, White guys get all the jokes and laughs in movies, because they are the only ones writers can make fun of in any significant way. Screenwriters and executives don't welcome the inevitable protests and demands by advocacy groups. Western women, freed from massive insecurity that characterized women's lives even fifty years ago, now wish for excitement among men and find most Western White men who by nature of advancement, must be boring, well ... boring.

So Western elites, with some assistance from Western Women, desiring excitement and followers of fashion and "correct" elite opinion (just watch any episode of the View or peruse a gossip magazine in the Supermarket checkout counter), have allied themselves with Islamists and Muslims (and in America, La Raza reconquista folks). This state of affairs has lasted from essentially, the mid 1980's (the 1986 Immigration and Reform and Control Act) until the present day. PC rules, "Big Man" exceptions (neither Mel Gibson nor Oliver Stone lack for defenders, and Charlie Sheen got a raise in his sit-com), de-masculinized ordinary men, hyper-masculinized Big Men, and the imposition of "tolerance" to the point of decadence and weakness, have characterized American (and Western) political and cultural life up until now.

Which the Ground Zero Victory Mosque has brought to a head.

But just like any bubble or ponzi scheme, the alliance with Islamists and Jihadists, and the La Raza folks, by the Western Elites, is not sustainable. Eventually things fall apart, because of money.

Ordinary people, and the state the depends on them, are running out of money. Joe Biden claims that 8 million jobs lost will never come back, in the "new normal." Toleration of drib-drab jihadism and terrorism in phony credit-fueled boom-times, with shiny new cars, electronic toys, and so on was one thing. Prospective decades of massive (real terms, around 22%) unemployment and declining or stagnant wages, coupled with massive vulnerability to commodity (oil, food, water) shocks created by natural disaster or deliberately by regulations, make ordinary Americans boiling with anger.

Politicians can be voted out of office, by massive voter tides of angry ordinary people, but judges, lawyers, law school deans, law schools, Hollywood, the news media, and the like cannot. Particularly given the natural tendency of defeated elected officials to huddle with those still in office and form a lobbying-NGO-governmental barrier to produce more of the same. More PC, more "tolerance" (weakness and decadence) and more invitations to Jihadists and Islamists to provoke and attack ordinary Americans.

No doubt most on the Left, and amongst the elite, would welcome another attack (as long as they are not victims) as a "teachable moment" to humble ordinary Americans and make them surrender more to Islam and Jihad. This was the effect in Britain to the 7/7, and 7/14 and 7/21 suicide bomber attacks. Islam is now a special, protected religion with unique privileges and rights not available to ordinary Britons, who must show deference at all times to Muslims and Islam.

America is not Britain, however. Among other things it is far, far bigger, subject to the tyranny of distance.

Much like returning African soldiers to Kenya, who had fought for Britain against the Wehrmacht or Imperial Japanese Army, saw both British weakness (against Germany and Japan) first-hand, and betrayal of the promises they found implicit, i.e. fight for Britain and get Kenyan independence, ordinary Americans will likely soon see the mighty humbled, if the projected wave of Democratic defeats happens. And implicit with the defeat will be the betrayal of the promise Obama and Dems gave in the fall of 2008, to restore the economy and put Americans back to work at good paying jobs. Instead we have the "new normal" of permanent unemployment of 22%, or more, and a constant:

I think it was a ballsy, unpolitician-like thing to do. He could have folded before all your BS birther-secret-muslim crap and took the cowards way out, but nooo…. He waggled his junk right in your faces and said “Teabag this!” Awesome.

The anger of ordinary Americans stems from a sense of betrayal (by the media, by the Democratic Party, by Obama personally), along with economic desperation and a sense of weakness, egged on by needless provocations by the Professional Left.

Meanwhile, Islamists and Jihadists confuse Western elite decadence and "tolerance" for that of the people, and keep escalating their "war aims" to include Sharia and domination in Western lands. With a man born a Muslim and of obvious Muslim sympathies (who may or may not be an observant Muslim but is definitely culturally Muslim) in the White House, jihadists and Islamists see this as their time for decisive blows to get guaranteed concessions, arguing that "fighting spirit" can trump the larger non-Muslim population in the West, as it had in places like Spain, Southern Italy, Sicily, Egypt, North Africa, and the former Byzantine Empire.

Building the Mosque at Ground Zero, on the grounds of a building damaged beyond repair by the falling debris of the World Trade Center, is nothing less than a deliberate provocation by Muslims world-wide and in America (no American Muslims have protested against it), designed to show dominance and American submission. It is the guaranteed flashpoint for the new Mau Mau.

Jihadists will not be able to resist the desire to "waggle their junk in your faces" and shout their pleasure at 9/11, and the "total victory" of Sharia replacing the Constitution and indeed, the American Way of Life. With a Muslim President (culturally at the least) in the White House, and a green light to engage in provocation, celebrations of the "9/11 Martyrs" and "victory over America" are bound to happen. As well as conspiracies hatched from that place, immune to eavesdropping and surveillance by a Federal and Local government on the side of Islamists.

Inevitably, small concealed video cameras will catch the worst of it, including likely open calls to Jihad and killing, and the applause of the Muslim audience. Infiltrators are almost certainly preparing, with careful back stories, and their own efforts that would have required news organizations or police forces now available to ordinary people who are pissed off.

Youtube and other venues will feature inflammatory videos calling for death to America, and submission to Sharia, and praise of bin Laden as the future ruler of America, along with Obama as his willing partner. At a certain point "waving his junk in your faces" becomes the starting point for a fight. Elite weakness provokes Jihadist attacks and thus populist anger and open revolt.

The old Mau-Mau, in which Obama's grandfather took part, stood in part for a Swahili Acronym meaning "Let the European go back to Europe, Let the Kikuyu get Independence". While European settlers were certainly targets, the main targets of the Mau-Mau were those collaborating with British rule, many being killed by herding into huts that were then set on fire. Atrocities such as this:

Perhaps the most famous Mau Mau victim was Michael Ruck, aged six, who was killed along with his parents. Newspapers in Kenya and abroad published graphic murder details and postmortem photos, including images of young Michael with bloodied teddy bears and trains strewn on his bedroom floor.

were widely publicized, though by all accounts the White victims were about 40 or so, while the Kikuyu victims were about 20,000 or more, and the horrors they underwent practically unspeakable. [It has been suggested that Obama's grandfather was an unwilling collaborator, one who broke under torture, given his relatively light sentence and less brutal physical treatment than others. Less brutal in that he was not castrated, or had a bullet through his head, or impaled, all actions done by British Imperial powers "unofficially" to the Mau-Mau.]

Obama's grandfather, who was initially sceptical of the revolt, noting accurately that "the African cannot build his own bicycle" was later enthusiastic, believing that the superior numbers and will would break the British effort to retain colonial control (which it did).

The elites in the West have police, military, cultural, and economic power — but not the confidence of the people. The Islamists and Jihadists are hated and loathed by ordinary Americans, and the Ground Zero Victory Mosque is a permanent provocation to all Americans. The elites, instead of surrendering gracefully and garnering what concessions they can to a populist revolt, are likely to cling to power by judicial and executive fiat, fairly repressive measures that are characterized by "Revolutionary Suicide" that deprive American Federal (and State) governments of legitimacy and standing, and will reflexively side with what amounts to "Imperial Colonial Troops" from another part of the world imposed upon the native populace. Writ smaller, this is the situation all across the West as well. It characterizes France, Spain, Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and Denmark as well as the rest of Scandinavia.

The likelihood is a long, slow slide into violence. Because all possibilities for real social and political and economic change will blocked by the elites, with the threat of Islamist/Jihadist violence used to justify "colonial stasis."

Kenyan Kikuyus were not "unique." They behaved like most colonized peoples, fed up with a colonizer they viewed as both weak and illegitimate. There were serious barriers to any possibility of success, early, and so extreme violence against innocents to make statements that Kenya belonged to the Kikuyu and not Europeans or allies, to instill terror and fear, were the tools the Mau-Mau employed.

The dynamics are clear. Elites plan to rule, to "wave their junk in your faces" and say "teabag this!" no matter what. Islamists and Jihadists plan to rule as well, using "fighting spirit" and terror as their own tools for domination and what they see as God-willed submission by America, given not just weakness but provocative weakness by elites. Eventually, ordinary Americans will turn to these tools as well, using them first against elites who remain allied to the Jihadists, as the Mau-Mau did to colonial collaborators and sympathizers, and then against the hated Jihadists. And the struggle is likely to be long, bloody, and marked by hardening "war aims" the way WWI turned most of Western Europe into a charnel house with both Allies and Axis rapidly escalating War Aims and demands.

The people are likely to demand an internment, and expulsion, of all Muslims from America. It may not happen a year from now, or even ten years from now, but if this struggle of low-level, constant violence amidst poverty and economic recession drags on from decade to decade, it will happen. The Jihadists are likely to demand total and complete submission to Islam and the imposition of an Islamic state along the lines of Taliban run Afghanistan as the price for peace. The elites are likely to desire nothing less than massive replacement of the existing White majority by Mexicans and others, with mass immigration to "drown" the opposition to their rule. Which in turn is likely to be resisted by Mau-Mau means, as a constant, dreadful level of violence and reprisal and ethnic cleansing characterizes America (and the West).

All sides are relatively evenly balanced. The people have demography (for now) but little power and less organization, the Tea Party, tools like Facebook, blogs, the internet, or parties like Gert Wilder's notwithstanding. In their struggle, they are likely to find their own Mau-Mau, from people not even yet engaged in the struggle, and like the Mau-Mau, be mostly disorganized, mostly the victims not the perpetrators, and yet capable of astonishingly cruel acts of terror against those they view as oppressors.

The elites have political, social, economic, and cultural power, but all are eroding amidst a rapid shift from bubble-boom to permanent economic decline and a "Rendezvous with Scarcity" (ala Ed Driscoll) that limits their power. Few patronage opportunities on a wide scale (ala FDR) abound, with limited money, non-Whites being first come and first served (Affirmative Action preferences), and erosion of female preferences for elite rule (with vast economic uncertainty making boring Beta males a better bet than exciting Alphas, and critically the policies that favor the one group over the other). Most importantly, nearly all institutions including Congress, the Presidency (and this particular President), the Media, the judiciary, the law itself, have lost confidence and legitimacy. Only the US military retains support and confidence, and outside the General staff is profoundly hostile to Obama and Dems.

Moreover, the elites by their nature cannot help "waggling their junk in your faces and saying teabag this!" It is second nature. Making any successful appeal to the widespread populace doomed.

The Muslim jihadists and Islamists have at their disposal, vast amounts of Gulf and Pakistani and Iranian oil money. A vast and seething population of men afflicted by polygamy (pricing most of them out of the "proper marriage market" with "proper Muslim women") gives a near limitless number of lean and hungry men willing to use violence to become Big Men or find 72 virgins in the afterlife. The vast Muslim population outside the US, and the tiny one within it, senses decadent weakness among the elites, and a green light for any atrocity that might produce an abject surrender. Contact with the US military has led to a winnowing out of ineffective jihadis and a wealth of experience among survivors, along with a sense of innovation in mass-killing that produces a feeling of terror and helplessness among victims and triumph and victory among perpetrators.

Like WWI, the fight can go on for a long time. False "victories" such as the failed Ludendorff Offensive, bogging down in defensive trenches far to the rear, are likely to characterize the struggle. The Reconquista of Spain took nearly 700 years, and the Muslim conquest of Byzantium took nearly 1,000. Victory is likely to go to those with more resources, or those with most effective resources (the side who uses it most effectively and wisely). In this, the very bigness of America, its wide open spaces, its large population, its relative freedom from widespread welfare states, may prove the decisive factor.

The borders may simply be declared "open" and anyone who crosses them declared a "citizen" instantly able to vote, demand Affirmative Action privileges, and welfare. But the "bigness" of America lends itself to extra-legal action as Prohibition provoked, along the lines of massive individual illegal behavior. Not perhaps drinking in speakeasy joints, but refusing to hire, rent to, serve, or otherwise accommodate the wave of immigrants from collapsing Mexico, itself falling to narco-trafficantes and terminal corruption. Other means could include States openly defying the Federal Government with their own "border patrol" in all but name, with various state offenses shifting around in response to Federal challenges and refusal to allow "instant citizens, just add water" to vote or receive any government resources. For every Federal/Elite action, or Jihadist atrocity, there is a populist response, soon itself counter-attacked, but likely to "flow" into the next battle. The race card itself being null and void, and the legitimacy and power of the Civil Rights movement at an end.

But sadly, the lights are going out all across the West. It is unlikely we will see them lit again in our lifetimes, save a Mau-Mau type firing of huts filled with people, or the equivalent by the "colonial authorities." It is certain that the America that results from this struggle will be radically different, as Germany and England and France were, from the one that went before it.

A long struggle will make the Federal (and State and Local) governments irrelevant and indeed, hostile to the needs and wants of ordinary Americans, and considered that way for generations to come. American and Western peoples will inevitably organize themselves along ethnic/racial lines, as multiculturalism falls apart in real world challenges of providing security and prosperity, and the ethno-state proves itself once again. Either America will be Hispanicized, and turned into a variant of Northern Mexico, or the great masses of Mexicans will be expelled inevitably along with Muslims. The reality of limited jobs, and other resources, guarantee the sort of action seen when an Indian tribe gains a casino — they kick out as many tribal members as they can to maximize wealth.

An America, or the West, not drowned in immigration, is likely to be a fairly brutal, discriminatory, ethno-state, without the slightest bit of guilt, oriented around mercantilism, protectionism, somewhere between Japan, China, and Russia today, though with far weaker leaders and far more power pushed downwards. That is the power of conflict, to reshape a people in ways that would have been unthinkable before. The reverse, of course, will be the replication of Brazil or Mexico or Cuba onto the West, with a Big Man rule, and some type of Sharia and Muslim rule to produce a "peace" (of the sort found in Egypt).

At any rate, the 1986-Present consensus of PC and Multiculturalism is coming to an end. The growing power of the Muslim world, the weakness and decadence of the elite, the frustration of the people, and the equalizing role of technology among those less powerful (the people, with the internet and cheap video cameras, Muslims with nukes) to the old elite-led nation state, is likely to produce profound changes.

It did not have to be this way, but the self-serving emotional power of "waggling his junk in your faces" proved too much.
...Read more